Press release from FIA, setting the record straight

FIA issued a press release following the confusing events of yesterday. Here is the full text of June 9 FIA press release:

Before FOTA’s decision to walk out of yesterday’s Technical Working Group meeting, the President of the FIA wrote twice to the President of FOTA to remind him that any amendments to the 2010 FIA Formula One World Championship regulations were subject to the unanimous approval of the five teams that had already entered for next season under the rules as published.

This is because of the International Sporting Code and also because the entered teams have a contract with the FIA which not even the General Assembly or the World Council can abrogate. Anyone with an elementary knowledge of motor sport governance knows this. Imagine the uproar if, after the FOTA teams had entered, the World Council were subsequently to change the rules without asking them.

It follows that the agreement of the five teams currently entered in the 2010 World Championship to all 2010 rule changes is required. To suggest that FOTA were only made aware of this during the meetings of yesterday is quite simply untrue. So is the implicit claim that they were all unaware of one of motor sport’s basic principles.

As things stand, the current members of the F1 Technical and Sporting Working Groups, in relation to 2010 are the teams which have entered the 2010 Championship. However the 8 FOTA teams were invited to the meetings in order that all 13 teams could agree the 2010 Sporting and Technical Regulations which would then be the so-called ‘stable regulations’ in a new Concorde Agreement. The SWG took place in the morning on this basis and much progress was made. However in the afternoon the FOTA teams walked out of the TWG. Nevertheless the five entered teams were able to confirm the changes agreed by the World Council in Paris on 24 June, as announced yesterday.

It has always been the FIA’s understanding that the FOTA teams wanted a Concorde Agreement in place before entering the 2010 Championship. Once entered, the FOTA teams could no longer threaten a breakaway because of the contractual position mentioned above.

The basis for the FIA agreeing to drop plans for a cost cap was the proposal prepared by the Williams team over the Silverstone weekend which would allow an agreed reduction of expenditure to the level of the early 1990s by the end of 2011 to be dealt with by the teams themselves. This reduction was agreed by FOTA and confirmed by them in Paris on 24 June. This would be a private, legally-enforceable contract involving all the teams, but not the FIA. The FIA confirmed in Paris that once this agreement is in place, the cost cap provisions can be removed from the 2010 Sporting Regulations.

The deal that the FIA reached with FOTA in Paris was to extend the 1998 Concorde Agreement with some minor amendments to the governance section. This would have put in place an F1 Commission to deal with future rules with any major question going to the FIA Senate.However, on 25 June, instead of the 1998 Agreement with some minor amendments, the FIA received 350 pages of a completely new Concorde Agreement.

It being wholly impractical to involve the Senate in such detailed negotiations, the contract was handed over to FIA lawyers, who worked on it tirelessly over the weekend 27-28 June and gave comments during a three-hour conference call on Monday 29 June. Then the 350 pages of 25 June turned out not to be the final FOTA/FOA version and elements of a new version appeared, partly on 2 July, partly on 3 July.

Again, FIA lawyers worked over the weekend on 4-5 July, as did FIA President Max Mosley and FIA Deputy President (sport) Nick Craw. Further comments were then given on a three and a half hour lawyers’ call on Monday 6 July and again in a conference call yesterday, 8 July, following the circulation of further drafts. Further significant progress was made yesterday evening in yet another conference call.

At present it seems probable that a final draft of the 2009 Concorde Agreement will be agreed and ready for signature in the coming days.

Reading this one gets the feeling that all goes as agreed, that each side should be well aware of the sequence of steps to come. But then, if the above is indeed the case, why would choose to increase the tentions by walking out from the meeting ?

2 Comments Post a Comment
  1. TimmieNo Gravatar says:

    I think they just like alienating and confusing fans to the point where they no longer follow the sport.

    Seems like Williams are the ones that helped set up the idea for 1990 spending, so that would suggest the five other teams agree and would sign the amended changes anyway….

    I really wonder what else went on that causes a walk out as it can’t just be because they weren’t “officially” recognised.

    I’m hoping that the Concorde agreement is signed and agreed upon shortly, because that would then bind them fully no matter what and we could get past the bull and maybe get some real answers out of what is actually oging to happen. Oh and then we could focus on the racing….maybe for the first time in like three of or four seasons.

  2. KotenokNo Gravatar says:

    The FOTA teams may have realized they’ve have been shooting themselves in the foot. FOTA broke the only one unity of the F1 teams, by suspending the only single ones which could help them to agree with everything as a group (Williams and Force India), as FIA requests, for fixing the 2010 regulations. Without complete agreement of the 5 teams which currently entered to the championship with FOTA’s intentions there’s no way that any rule changes for now, and the other 8, as result of their conditional entrance… Finally haven’t no say in the matter!! Because they’re currently not signed into the 2010 WC.

    What for FOTA’s representatives need to sit in the meeting then? They may have gone to find a solution to their problem, or mistake, or just have gone to discuss their situation or whatever, really it just seems again a declaration of principles. FOTA’s people may have gone their way out to keep pulling the rope to their field, but it seems to me that they will break soon that string… There’s anybody who doesn’t think that they’re not intransigent?

    I think nobody wants to lose the F1 teams which currently are racing, personally it would be a pity to lose a big number of qualified rivals, but they don’t find their own way to a real solution, they’re unable to play the Game with the same rules. Now FOTA’s teams individually shall decide which is their future, because there are signs that not all FOTA members know what they want… Keep in the competition, move to another parallel championship or simply disappear.
    .-= Kotenok´s last blog ..F1Wolf updated their profile =-.

promogifts.hk

2013 Teams and Drivers

Red Bull
1. Sebastian VETTEL
2 Mark WEBBER
Ferrari
3. Fernando ALONSO
4. Felipe MASSA
McLaren
5. Jenson BUTTON
6. Sergio PEREZ
Lotus
7. Kimi RAIKKONEN
8. Romain GROSJEAN
Mercedes
9. Nico ROSBERG
10. Lewis HAMILTON
Sauber
11. Nico HULKENBERG
12. Esteban GUTIEREZ
Force India
14. Paul di RESTA
15. Adrian SUTIL
Williams
16. Pastor MALDONADO
17. Valtteri BOTTAS
Toro Rosso
18. Daniel RICCIARDO
19. Jean Eric VERGNE
Caterham
20. Charles PIC
21. Giedo van der GARDE
Marussia
24. Jules BIANCHI
25. Max CHILTON

2013 F1 Calendar

15-17 March - Australia
22-24 March - Malaysia
12-14 April - China
19-21 April - Bahrain
10-12 May - Spain
23-26 May - Monaco
07-09 June - Canada
28-30 June - Great Britain
5-7 July - Germany
26-28 July - Hungary
23-25 August - Belgium
06-08 September - Italy
20-22 September - Singapore
04-06 October - Korea
11-13 October - Japan
25-27 October - India
01-03 November - Abu Dhabi
15-17 November - USA
22-24 November - Brazil

Archives

2010 Mercedes GP F1 Merchandise