WMSC decisions on testing, budget cap and media

This is a very long post and a lot to digest… Further to the brand new way of deciding the Formula One Drivers’ Champion FIA made also decisions on testing, media and budget. FIA also approved Brawn GP F1 entry in place of Honda F1 Racing (treating the team as a new team but waiving the usual fees).

Testing - Teams will be allowed to carry out three one day young driver training tests between the end of the last event of the Championship and 31 December of the same year. Only drivers who have not competed in more than two F1 World Championship Events in the preceding 24 months or tested a Formula One car on more than four days in the same 24 month period will be eligible.

FIA also clamped down on straight line aero tests – only eight one day aerodynamic tests (on FIA approved straight line or constant radius sites) between January 1, 2009 and the end of the last Event of the 2009 Championship will be permitted.

Media - It looks like here FIA implemented ideas proposed by FOTA:

The FIA will publish the weights of all cars after qualifying at each Event.

For greater clarity for spectators and media, wet tyres have been renamed “intermediate” and extreme-weather tyres renamed “wet”.

On the first day of practice all drivers must be available for autograph signing in their designated team space in the pit lane.

All drivers eliminated in qualifying must make themselves available for media interviews immediately after the end of each session.

Any driver retiring before the end of the race must make himself available for media interviews after his return to the paddock.

All drivers who finish the race outside the top three must make themselves available immediately after the end of the race for media interviews.

During the race every team must make at least one senior spokesperson available for interviews by officially accredited TV crews.

The most interesting is the budget cap rule. Teams will have option to sign up for voluntary GBP30 million budget cap in return for less restrictions. This figure will cover all expenditure of any kind. Anything subsidised or supplied free will be deemed to have cost its full commercial value and rigorous auditing procedures will apply.

To enable these cars to compete with those from teams which are not subject to cost constraints, the cost-capped cars will be allowed greater technical freedom.

The principal technical freedoms allowed are as follows:

1. A more aerodynamically efficient (but standard) under body.
2. Movable wings.
3. An engine which is not subject to a rev limit or a development freeze.

The FIA has the right to adjust elements of these freedoms to ensure that the cost-capped cars have neither an advantage nor a disadvantage when compared to cars running to the existing rules.

It is an interesting idea but also an idea that will complicate the whole show. And how on Earth do FIA guys plan to police this budget cap ? Max Mosley seems to be very confident they can. He is also confident that this will attract new teams as early as in 2010 and already talking talking about allowing more than 12 teams to compete (towards the end of the Q&A). Worth attention is also his note on how many teams can one engine manufacturer supply… Here is the Q&A with the FIA president released by FIA today.

What is the budget figure?

Max Mosley: Provisionally it will be £30 million per two-car team per season (currently €33m, or $42m).

How can you possibly run a Formula One team for that sort of money?

MM: It has been carefully costed. The cars will be much less refined in detail, because the teams will not be able to spend huge sums on minute advantages (for example, $1,200 on a wheel nut which is only used once), but from the grandstand or on television they won’t look or sound any less “Formula One” than the current, ultra-expensive cars. They will also be more interesting to the technically-minded because of the special features which will allow them to compete against teams with much bigger budgets. And don’t forget that £30 million is still a huge amount of money in the real world.

But surely that budget is not “Formula One”, what about Formula One’s DNA?

MM: Keith Duckworth once said “an engineer is someone who can do for one dollar what any idiot can do for a hundred dollars”. These rules will encourage clever engineering – success will come to the teams with the best ideas, not only the teams with the most money.

What does the cap include?

MM: Everything except the motor home (if the team has one) and any fine(s) imposed by the FIA. All expenditure will be included, even the salaries of the drivers and team principal. If the team is profitable, it can pay a dividend to its shareholders, who may well include a chief engineer, team principal or even a driver. But we would make sure the team was genuinely making enough profit to cover the dividend.

How can you possibly check? Won’t there be all sorts of under-the-counter payments and avoidance mechanisms?

MM: We went into all this very carefully some time ago. We involved forensic accountants from Deloitte and Touche as well as financial experts from the current teams. The vast majority of payments are traceable and any benefits in kind can be valued. There were a number of meetings. It became clear we could do it. The problem was getting the current teams to agree a figure. Also, the majority wanted a lot of exclusions such as land and buildings, the team principal’s salary and the drivers. We would also need the right to carry out very intrusive audits and impose severe penalties for overspend. However these difficulties no longer arise because each team will now be able to choose whether or not to run under the cost cap.

What about the engine?

MM: The engine will comply with current rules, except that there will be no rev limit and no development freeze. However, the entire engine expenditure will come out of the cap. If the engine is supplied by an outside commercial entity or another team, we will have to be satisfied that there is no hidden subsidy. If a team has its own engine, we will check its full cost just as we will the rest of the car. The current rule limiting manufacturers to supplying engines to one additional team each will remain in place.

But surely this is going in the opposite direction to your cost cuts?

MM: No. If a team’s total expenditure is limited, the money is saved so detailed regulation aimed at saving cost in specific areas are no longer needed. A team could spend £20 million a year on its engine but would then have only £10 million left for everything else. It would probably not be competitive. The same applies to the other restrictions which will be swept away for the cost-capped teams such as limits on wind tunnel use, testing, exotic materials or giant computers (subject of course to current safety requirements). They can even spend on private jets and luxury hotels. But whatever they spend must come out of the £30 million.

What technical and other freedoms will the cost-capped teams have which are not available to the other teams?

MM: A different (but standard) under body, movable wings, no engine rev limit, no restriction on the number or type of updates, no homologation requirements, no limits on materials, testing, simulators, wind tunnels and so forth – most of the cost saving measures introduced over the last few years will not apply to these teams. However measures to save money during the race weekend, such as the ban on refuelling and the Saturday parc fermé, will apply to both categories of team. We are also thinking about a much bigger capacity KERS for the cost-capped teams. But all this must be covered by the £30 million – no exceptions and no free or subsidised outside help. Anything supplied by another team or an outside supplier will be included at its full commercial cost except for items supplied to all teams at subsidised rates under the single supplier arrangements negotiated by the FIA (e.g. for tyres), which allow all teams to benefit equally from reduced costs.

But isn’t that unfair? With a specially shaped under body and movable wings won’t these cars have an unfair advantage?

MM: No, we will make sure these advantages do no more than balance the disadvantages the cost-capped teams will have because of their very restricted budgets. As said, we will balance the median performances by adjusting the cost-capped cars should this prove necessary. The other cars will have stable technical regulations in return for which we understand FOTA intend to provide guarantees of continuing participation until 2012, underwritten by the major car manufacturers. The FIA has a lot of experience in performance adjustment and equivalence.

Could a team use the standard KERS proposed by FOTA?

MM: It could, but again this would have to come out of the £30 million. We are not keen on the idea of a standard KERS, because this is an area in which Formula One can innovate in a way that is road-relevant. But nothing in our current rules stops groupings of teams from agreeing parameters for KERS if they wish, because KERS is not compulsory. Perhaps the cost-capped teams will innovate in this area despite their restricted budgets.

Could a cost capped car win a race or even the Championship?

MM: There is no reason why cost-capped teams could not win races. The massive and highly organised unlimited-expenditure teams are perhaps likely to do a better job of going racing. They will have the most expensive race engineers and tacticians not to mention the top-earning drivers. However, racing is (and should be) unpredictable.

What about things you haven’t thought of?

MM: We will have a catch-all clause for the cost-capped teams enabling us to stop anything which goes against the spirit of the cost cap and allow us to rule definitively on any unforeseen problem. The unlimited-expenditure teams however will benefit from absolutely stable technical rules. Rule stability is part of the above-mentioned deal which FOTA are arranging with the major car manufacturers.

Surely with the FOTA teams cutting expenditure by 50% in 2010 and further cuts in the pipeline for 2011, all this is unnecessary?

MM: Back in December when we met the teams in Monaco, we would have agreed. However, the world-wide economic crisis has worsened very significantly since then. No-one can say the situation will not deteriorate further in the coming months. If this happens, we may lose other manufacturers or even independent teams, despite their best intentions. If we wait and things get worse, it will be too late. Conversely, if economic conditions suddenly improve, we will at least have some new blood in Formula One. It is obviously the FIA’s duty to try to plan for the worst case rather than just hope for the best.

When will you publish detailed regulations?

MM: Shortly after the World Motor Sport Council meeting of 17 March.

When will teams be able to enter?

MM: As soon as the regulations are published.

But FOTA have not yet finalised their detailed proposals.

MM: We cannot wait, because new teams wishing to enter the 2010 Championship will need to start work immediately. FOTA have already given us their main ideas, we understand that the outstanding matters are more minor. Also, provided they comply with all relevant laws, rules and regulations and observe the spirit of sporting competition, there is nothing to stop some FOTA members agreeing among themselves to observe certain rules or conventions provided these do not affect anyone else.

What will you do if you receive more serious applications than there are spaces?

MM: We are going to ask the World Motor Sport Council to agree to increase the number of teams allowed to participate (currently 12) provided the Safety Commission is satisfied that circuit safety has progressed to the point where this would pose no safety problem. Each entrant will also have to satisfy us that they have a source for an engine and transmission.

Do you not fear that sponsors will reduce payments if they know teams cost less to run?

MM: No. Sponsors will pay what the brand exposure on offer is worth to them. Competitors in sports like tennis or golf earn large sums despite their costs being minimal compared to Formula One. Sponsors in the current climate are more likely to be repelled by obvious profligacy than by a budget cap.

Will the cost-capped teams score points and be eligible for payments from FOM on the same basis as the other teams?

MM: Yes, the cost-capped teams and their drivers will participate fully in the FIA Formula One World Championship. We understand that FOM will pay the cost-capped teams on the same basis as other teams and will also provide $10 million plus the standard transport package for the 11th and 12th teams starting in 2010.

6 Comments Post a Comment
  1. TimmieNo Gravatar says:

    Wow…..these guys are idiots right???

    No offence Max. but please god retire before you make this any worse!!!!

    Tehre are some good ideas in there for usre, but in the overall picture. he is outright killing the sport. I can’t really see many teams agreeing to the budget cap. Well there will be a few (in my mind) but not many that is for sure.

    Every time i think the FIA and FOM can’t make it any worse than they already have, they take it to another level and stuff it up even more! Killing a great sport, piece by piece, wish they would stop breaking what once was a sport that worked just fine!

  2. F1WolfNo Gravatar says:

    I did not see too much positive response to this and I am not surprised. This whole is thing is ridiculous. This may all turn out to be simply an opening gambit in brand new chess game between FIA and the teams. Mosley has been saying for a long time that the teams do not go far enough in cutting costs, so some shocker like this was coming. This is the strategy he has been using for quite a while – come up with something totally mad and later make the teams settle on some compromise (perhaps on something he actually wants them to settle on). Just remember the standard engine supply idea. He actually went as far as choosing the winner of the tender. So now F1 has Cosworth V8 as a standard engine available to anyone, just no one is using it as the manufacturers agreed on supplying engines to independents “cheaply”. Perhaps what Mosley wanted in a first place.

    Now he comes up with this budget cap. The amount is rather low and I can’t imagine anyone running a team on such budget to come up with competitive car no matter how much freedom will they get. Mosley’s intention may be to send out strong signal to the teams that this is what one day will happen, will be compulsory, FIA will be able to police it, so better get used to the idea. Then one day FIA and FOTA will agree on workable level of that budget cap, and things will go.

    Difference this time however is, that the budget cap combined with more development freedom is already a reality, it is a rule. That means a team run this way can compete next year. If that works, Mosley will have strong argument againts the big spenders. If it does not, what will he care ? He will tinker with the rules again … Mosley has nothing ti loose, only the current F1 teams …

  3. zblkhwkNo Gravatar says:

    I may be one of the few, but I like the idea. Unfortunately, I do not think it will be managable. F1 has been a sport with teams “bending the rules”. This just opens the door for more of that.

    If I was one of the low budget teams, I would spend heavy this year to develop many of the areas where restrictions have been lifted, then go under the cap having done much of the development. I can see Williams and Renault playing that game next year.

    • F1WolfNo Gravatar says:

      If I was one of the low budget teams, I would spend heavy this year to develop many of the areas where restrictions have been lifted, then go under the cap having done much of the development. I can see Williams and Renault playing that game next year.

      one of the problems that this 2 ties F1 would create …

  4. bmwf1guyNo Gravatar says:

    Good point on the low budget teams spending and then capping. The other point I find interesting is the manufacturer teams surely want to steer away from a cap. At some point in this recession their bosses the auto manufacturers themselves may just like this cap.

    bmwf1guys last blog post..My Thoughts in Short on the Revised F1 Point System

  5. […] The voluntary GBP30 mil budget cap however is something that perhaps should not be so surprising. Max Mosley made it clear on several occassions that the cost cutting and cost saving proposals from FOTA do not go far enough. Some radical decision was clearly coming and something radical was expected to come out of March 17 WMSC meeting. […]


2014 Teams and Drivers

Red Bull
Sebastian VETTEL
Fernando ALONSO
Adrian SUTIL
Force India
Sergio PEREZ
Felipe MASSA
Valtteri BOTTAS
Toro Rosso
Daniil KVYAT
Jean Eric VERGNE

2014 F1 Calendar

14-16 March - Australia
28-30 March - Malaysia
4-6 April - Bahrain
18-20 April - China
9-11 May - Spain
22-25 May - Monaco
6-8 June - Canada
20-22 June - Austria
4-6 July - Great Britain
18-20 July - Germany
25-27 July - Hungary
22-24 August - Belgium
5-7 September - Italy
19-21 September - Singapore
3-5 October - Japan
10-12 October - Russia
31 October-2 November - USA
7-9 November - Brazil
21-23 November - Abu Dhabi


2010 Mercedes GP F1 Merchandise
hello world